Modifications of Einstein's theory of gravitation have been extensively considered in the past years, in connection to both cosmology and quantum gravity. Higher-curvature and higher-derivative gravity theories constitute the main examples of such modifications. These theories exhibit, in general, more degrees of freedom than those found in standard general relativity; counting, identifying, and retrieving the description/representation of such dynamical variables is currently an open problem, and a decidedly nontrivial one. In this work we review, via both formal arguments and custom-made examples, the most relevant methods to unveil the gravitational degrees of freedom of a given model, discussing the merits, subtleties and pitfalls of the various approaches.
Higher-order theories of gravity: diagnosis, extraction and reformulation via non-metric extra degrees of freedom-a review / Alessio, Belenchia; Letizia, Marco; Liberati, Stefano; Di Casola, Eolo. - In: REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS. - ISSN 0034-4885. - 81:3(2018), pp. 1-34. [10.1088/1361-6633/aaa4ab]
Higher-order theories of gravity: diagnosis, extraction and reformulation via non-metric extra degrees of freedom-a review
Letizia, MarcoMembro del Collaboration group
;Stefano Liberati
Membro del Collaboration group
;Eolo Di CasolaMembro del Collaboration group
2018-01-01
Abstract
Modifications of Einstein's theory of gravitation have been extensively considered in the past years, in connection to both cosmology and quantum gravity. Higher-curvature and higher-derivative gravity theories constitute the main examples of such modifications. These theories exhibit, in general, more degrees of freedom than those found in standard general relativity; counting, identifying, and retrieving the description/representation of such dynamical variables is currently an open problem, and a decidedly nontrivial one. In this work we review, via both formal arguments and custom-made examples, the most relevant methods to unveil the gravitational degrees of freedom of a given model, discussing the merits, subtleties and pitfalls of the various approaches.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Belenchia_2018_Rep._Prog._Phys._81_036001.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
1.98 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.98 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.