: To fully embrace situations of radical uncertainty, we argue that the theory should abandon the requirements that narratives, in general, must lead to affective evaluation, and that they have to explain (and potentially simulate) all or even the bulk of the current decisional context. Evidence from studies of incidental learning show that narrative schemata can bias decisions while remaining fragmentary, insufficient for prediction, and devoid of utility values.

Narratives need not end well; nor say it all / Andreetta, S.; Spalla, D.; Treves, A.. - In: BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES. - ISSN 0140-525X. - 46:(2023), pp. 26-27. [10.1017/S0140525X22002655]

Narratives need not end well; nor say it all

Andreetta, S.;Spalla, D.;Treves, A.
2023-01-01

Abstract

: To fully embrace situations of radical uncertainty, we argue that the theory should abandon the requirements that narratives, in general, must lead to affective evaluation, and that they have to explain (and potentially simulate) all or even the bulk of the current decisional context. Evidence from studies of incidental learning show that narrative schemata can bias decisions while remaining fragmentary, insufficient for prediction, and devoid of utility values.
2023
Andreetta, S.; Spalla, D.; Treves, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
And+23bbs.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 262.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
262.1 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11767/135178
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact