Reduced Order Models (ROMs) have gained a great attention by the scientific community in the last years thanks to their capabilities of significantly reducing the computational cost of the numerical simulations, which is a crucial objective in applications like real time control and shape optimization. This contribution aims to provide a brief overview about such a topic. We discuss both a classic intrusive framework based on a Galerkin projection technique and hybrid/non-intrusive approaches, including Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINN), purely Data-Driven Neural Networks (NN), Radial Basis Functions (RBF), Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). We also briefly mention geometrical parametrization and dimensionality reduction methods like Active Subspaces (ASs). Then we test the performance of such approaches in terms of efficiency and accuracy against three academic test cases, the lid driven cavity, the flow past a cylinder and the geometrically parametrized Stanford Bunny. Moreover, we also briefly present some preliminary results related to a more complex case involving an industrial application.
A brief review of reduced order models using intrusive and non‐intrusive techniques / Padula, Guglielmo; Girfoglio, Michele; Rozza, Gianluigi. - In: PROCEEDINGS IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS. - ISSN 1617-7061. - 24:4(2024). ( 94TH ANNUAL MEETING of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Magdeburg, Germany 18-22 marzo 2024) [10.1002/pamm.202400210].
A brief review of reduced order models using intrusive and non‐intrusive techniques
Padula, Guglielmo;Girfoglio, Michele;Rozza, Gianluigi
2024-01-01
Abstract
Reduced Order Models (ROMs) have gained a great attention by the scientific community in the last years thanks to their capabilities of significantly reducing the computational cost of the numerical simulations, which is a crucial objective in applications like real time control and shape optimization. This contribution aims to provide a brief overview about such a topic. We discuss both a classic intrusive framework based on a Galerkin projection technique and hybrid/non-intrusive approaches, including Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINN), purely Data-Driven Neural Networks (NN), Radial Basis Functions (RBF), Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). We also briefly mention geometrical parametrization and dimensionality reduction methods like Active Subspaces (ASs). Then we test the performance of such approaches in terms of efficiency and accuracy against three academic test cases, the lid driven cavity, the flow past a cylinder and the geometrically parametrized Stanford Bunny. Moreover, we also briefly present some preliminary results related to a more complex case involving an industrial application.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proc Appl Math and Mech - 2024 - Padula.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: pdf editoriale
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.36 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.36 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


