We present a deep learning pipeline to perform a model-independent, likelihood-free search for anomalous (i.e., non-background) events in the proposed next-generation multi-ton scale liquid xenon-based direct detection experiment, DARWIN. We train an anomaly detector comprising a variational autoencoder (VAE) and a classifier on high-dimensional simulated detector response data and construct a 1D anomaly score to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of an excess of non-background-like events. We use simulated validation data to determine the power of the method to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of a WIMP dark matter signal, without any model-dependent assumption about the nature of the signal. We show that our neural networks learn relevant features of the events from low-level, high-dimensional detector outputs, avoiding lossy and computationally expensive compression into lower-dimensional observables. Our approach is complementary to the usual likelihood-based analysis, in that it reduces the reliance on many of the corrections and cuts that are traditionally part of the analysis chain, with the potential of achieving higher accuracy and significant reduction of analysis time. We envisage the methodology presented in this work augmenting or complementing likelihood-based and other data-driven methods currently utilized in the DARWIN (and in the future, XLZD) analysis pipeline.
Model-independent searches of new physics in DARWIN with deep learning / Zuber, K.; Zhong, M.; Zavattini, G.; Yuan, L.; Ye, J.; Yang, L.; Yamashita, M.; Xu, Z.; Xu, D.; Xing, Y.; Wurm, M.; Wustling, S.; Wu, V. H. S.; Wolf, J.; Wittweg, C.; Wilson, M.; Wenz, D.; Weiss, M.; Weinheimer, C.; Weerman, K. M.; Wang, W.; Vorkapic, D.; Volta, G.; Vetter, S.; Vecchi, S.; Valerius, K.; Utoyama, M.; Urquijo, P.; Tunnell, C. D.; Trotta, R.; Trinchero, G.; Toschi, F.; Tonnies, F.; Thummler, T.; Thers, D.; Tan, P. -L.; Takeda, A.; Stevens, A.; Steidl, M.; Stanley, O.; Solmaz, M.; Singh, R.; Simgen, H.; Shimada, T.; Shi, S. Y.; Shen, W.; Sharma, S.; Shagin, P.; Semeria, F.; Selvi, M.; Lavina, L. S.; Schwenck, A.; Schumann, M.; Eissing, H. S.; Schulte, P.; Schreiner, J.; Scaffidi, A.; Sartorelli, G.; Sanchez-Lucas, P.; Sanchez, L.; Razeto, A.; Ravindran, A.; Garcia, D. R.; Rajado, M.; Qin, J.; Qiao, K.; Qi, J.; Principe, L.; Pollmann, T. R.; Plante, G.; Pierre, M.; Pienaar, J.; Piastra, F.; Peres, R.; Pellegrini, Q.; Pandurovic, M.; Pan, Y.; Paetsch, B.; Ouahada, S.; Ostrowskiy, I.; Obradovic, M.; Oberlack, U.; O'Hare, C.; Ni, K.; Newstead, J. L.; Murra, M.; Muller, J.; Mosbacher, Y.; Morteau, E.; Moriyama, S.; Mora, K.; Monteiro, C. M. B.; Molinario, A.; Miyata, R.; Miuchi, K.; Milutinovic, S.; Milosovic, B.; Messina, M.; Menendez, J.; Melchiorre, A.; Mastroianni, S.; Masson, E.; Masbou, J.; Martens, K.; Marignetti, F.; Manenti, L.; Mancuso, A.; Maier, B.; Mahlstedt, J.; Macolino, C.; Ma, Y.; Luce, T.; Lucchetti, G. M.; Lopes, J. A. M.; Long, J.; Lombardi, F.; Loizeau, J.; Liu, K.; Lindner, M.; Lindemann, S.; Lin, Y. T.; Liang, Z.; Liang, S.; Li, S.; Li, A.; Li, I.; Levinson, L.; Lang, R. F.; Landsman, H.; Lacascio, L.; Kuger, F.; Krosigk, B. V.; Kopec, A.; Koke, D.; Kobayashi, M.; Klute, M.; Kleifges, M.; Kilminster, B.; Kharbanda, P.; Keller, M.; Kazama, S.; Kavrigin, P.; Kara, M.; Kaminaga, Y.; Kahlert, F.; Joerg, F.; James, R. S.; Jakob, J.; Itow, Y.; Iacovacci, M.; Hood, N. F.; Hoetzsch, L.; Hiraoka, K.; Hils, C.; Higuera, A.; Hargittai, N.; Hansmann-Menzemer, S.; Hannen, V.; Hammann, R.; Gyorgy, P.; Guida, M.; Guan, H.; Grossle, R.; Grigat, J.; Grandi, L.; Gluck, F.; Glade-Beucke, R.; Girard, F.; Giacomobono, R.; Garroum, N.; Gao, F.; Galloway, M.; Gaior, R.; Gaemers, P.; Fuselli, C.; Fulgione, W.; Fujikawa, K.; Flierman, M.; Flehmke, T.; Fischer, H.; Ferrari, C.; Ferella, A. D.; Engel, R.; Elykov, A.; Eitel, K.; Drexlin, G.; Doerenkamp, M.; Diglio, S.; Gangi, P. D.; Donato, C. D.; Deisting, A.; Decowski, M. P.; Garcia, L. C. D.; D'Andrea, V.; Cuenca-Garcia, J. J.; Conrad, J.; Colijn, A. P.; Chavez, A. P. C.; Chauvin, A.; Capelli, C.; Cai, C.; Budnik, R.; Bruni, G.; Brown, A.; Brommer, S.; Breskin, A.; Braun, R.; Boese, K.; Boehm, C.; Bismark, A.; Biondi, Y.; Biondi, R.; Bellagamba, L.; Bell, N. F.; Bazyk, M.; Baudis, L.; Barberio, E.; Balzer, M.; Bajpai, D.; Babicz, M.; Aprile, E.; Antunovic, B.; Anton Martin, D.; Angelino, E.; Andrieu, B.; Amaral, D. W. P.; Althueser, L.; Maouloud, S. A.; Adrover, M.; Abe, K.; Aalbers, J.. - In: THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL. C, PARTICLES AND FIELDS. - ISSN 1434-6044. - 86:3(2026), pp. 1-16. [10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15161-2]
Model-independent searches of new physics in DARWIN with deep learning
Xu Z.;Trotta R.
;Toschi F.;Shen W.;Scaffidi A.
;Pan Y.;Mastroianni S.;D'Andrea V.;Aprile E.;
2026-01-01
Abstract
We present a deep learning pipeline to perform a model-independent, likelihood-free search for anomalous (i.e., non-background) events in the proposed next-generation multi-ton scale liquid xenon-based direct detection experiment, DARWIN. We train an anomaly detector comprising a variational autoencoder (VAE) and a classifier on high-dimensional simulated detector response data and construct a 1D anomaly score to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of an excess of non-background-like events. We use simulated validation data to determine the power of the method to reject the background-only hypothesis in the presence of a WIMP dark matter signal, without any model-dependent assumption about the nature of the signal. We show that our neural networks learn relevant features of the events from low-level, high-dimensional detector outputs, avoiding lossy and computationally expensive compression into lower-dimensional observables. Our approach is complementary to the usual likelihood-based analysis, in that it reduces the reliance on many of the corrections and cuts that are traditionally part of the analysis chain, with the potential of achieving higher accuracy and significant reduction of analysis time. We envisage the methodology presented in this work augmenting or complementing likelihood-based and other data-driven methods currently utilized in the DARWIN (and in the future, XLZD) analysis pipeline.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
unpaywall-bitstream-237351480.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.2 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.2 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


