We continue the comparison between the field theoretical and geometrical approaches to the gauge field theories of various types, by deriving their Becchi–Rouet–Stora–Tyutin (BRST) and anti-BRST transformation properties and comparing them with the geometrical properties of the bundles and gerbes. In particular, we provide the geometrical interpretation of the so-called Curci–Ferrari conditions that are invoked for the absolute anticommutativity of the BRST and anti-BRST symmetry transformations in the context of non-Abelian one-form gauge theories as well as the Abelian gauge theory that incorporates a two-form gauge field. We also carry out the explicit construction of the three-form gauge fields and compare it with the geometry of 2-gerbes.
BRST, anti-BRST and their geometry / Bonora, Loriano; Malik, R. P.. - In: JOURNAL OF PHYSICS. A, MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL. - ISSN 1751-8113. - A43:(2010), p. 375403. [10.1088/1751-8113/43/37/375403]
BRST, anti-BRST and their geometry.
Bonora, Loriano;
2010-01-01
Abstract
We continue the comparison between the field theoretical and geometrical approaches to the gauge field theories of various types, by deriving their Becchi–Rouet–Stora–Tyutin (BRST) and anti-BRST transformation properties and comparing them with the geometrical properties of the bundles and gerbes. In particular, we provide the geometrical interpretation of the so-called Curci–Ferrari conditions that are invoked for the absolute anticommutativity of the BRST and anti-BRST symmetry transformations in the context of non-Abelian one-form gauge theories as well as the Abelian gauge theory that incorporates a two-form gauge field. We also carry out the explicit construction of the three-form gauge fields and compare it with the geometry of 2-gerbes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.