Multivariate classification algorithms are powerful tools for predicting cognitive or pathophysiological states from neuroimaging data. Assessing the utility of a classifier in application domains such as cognitive neuroscience, brain-computer interfaces, or clinical diagnostics necessitates inference on classification performance at more than one level, i.e., both in individual subjects and in the population from which these subjects were sampled. Such inference requires models that explicitly account for both fixed-effects (within-subjects) and random-effects (between-subjects) variance components. While models of this sort are standard in mass-univariate analyses of fMRI data, they have not yet received much attention in multivariate classification studies of neuroimaging data, presumably because of the high computational costs they entail. This paper extends a recently developed hierarchical model for mixed-effects inference in multivariate classification studies and introduces an efficient variational Bayes approach to inference. Using both synthetic and empirical fMRI data, we show that this approach is equally simple to use as, yet more powerful than, a conventional t-test on subject-specific sample accuracies, and computationally much more efficient than previous sampling algorithms and permutation tests. Our approach is independent of the type of underlying classifier and thus widely applicable. The present framework may help establish mixed-effects inference as a future standard for classification group analyses.
|Titolo:||Variational Bayesian mixed-effects inference for classification studies|
|Autori:||Brodersen, Kay H; Daunizeau, Jean; Mathys, Christoph; Chumbley, Justin R; Buhmann, Joachim M; Stephan, Klaas E|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2013|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.008|
|Fulltext via DOI:||10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.008|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||1.1 Journal article|